The Citizen Media Law Project has published a guide to using Twitter, Facebook, and other social networks and live-blogging tools in the courtroom. Many states have rules forbidding the use of cell phones and laptops in court, and even in the absence of such laws, some judges just can’t stand the idea of it. I was on a jury for a criminal trial in September, and the judge was firm on “No Twitter or Facebook in the courtroom” and actually, not when we returned home, either, until the trial ended.
An ‘additional tip’ in the guide reads:
Give the judge or PIO a good reason to approve your request. Successful requests for permission have generally focused on:
1. The nature and public benefit of blogging or tweeting;
2. The public interest in the case;
3. The reporter’s professional experience or credentials; and
4. An explanation of how the technology works.
-AH
Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.
Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website (optional)
You can use these tags:<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.
Leave your response!